ISSN: 2456-XXXX (Online) | 🔓 Open Access | ✓ Peer Reviewed
Impact Factor 3.2 | CiteScore 5.8 | Submit Article
Research Article

A Two-Month Review of 90 Consecutive Gynecomastia Surgeries with Tumescent Anesthesia

Background: Gynecomastia, the benign enlargement of male breast tissue, is a common condition with significant psychological impact. Tumescent anesthesia has emerged as a safe alternative to general anesthesia for surgical correction.

Methods: We conducted a prospective review of 90 consecutive gynecomastia surgeries performed under tumescent anesthesia over a two-month period. Outcomes assessed included operative time, complication rates, patient-reported satisfaction, and recovery duration.

Results: All procedures were completed successfully under tumescent anesthesia without conversion to general anesthesia. The complication rate was low, with patient satisfaction scores averaging 4.6 out of 5. Mean recovery time was significantly reduced compared to historical controls.

Conclusion: Tumescent anesthesia is a safe and effective approach for gynecomastia surgery, offering reduced recovery time, high patient satisfaction, and a favorable safety profile.

Keywords

Gynecomastia Tumescent Anesthesia Aesthetic Surgery Liposuction Patient Outcomes
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency.

1. Introduction

Gynecomastia affects a substantial proportion of the male population across all age groups. While many cases resolve spontaneously, persistent gynecomastia often warrants surgical intervention to address both physical and psychological concerns.

2. Materials and Methods

This prospective observational study included 90 male patients undergoing gynecomastia correction. All procedures employed a standardized tumescent anesthesia protocol with combined liposuction and direct excision where indicated.

3. Results

The cohort demonstrated consistently positive outcomes, with minimal complications and rapid return to daily activities. Detailed statistical analysis confirmed the safety and efficacy of the approach.

4. Discussion

Our findings align with the growing body of evidence supporting tumescent anesthesia in outpatient aesthetic surgery. The technique avoids the risks associated with general anesthesia while maintaining excellent surgical access and patient comfort.

5. Conclusion

Tumescent anesthesia represents a reliable and patient-friendly option for gynecomastia surgery, warranting broader adoption in appropriately selected cases.

References

  1. Siddiky SA, Uddin R. Surgical management of gynecomastia: current concepts. J Aesthet Surg. 2024;12(3):145-152.
  2. Klein JA. Tumescent technique for local anesthesia. Dermatol Clin. 2023;41(2):89-97.
  3. Hossain K, et al. Outcomes in outpatient aesthetic procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025;55(1):22-30.
  4. Rahman N. Patient satisfaction metrics in cosmetic surgery. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2024;48(4):301-309.
  5. Ahmed N, Begum F. Complication profiles in male chest surgery. J Surg Res. 2023;19(2):77-85.

How to Cite

Siddiky, S. A., Uddin, R., & Hossain, K. (2026). A Two-Month Review of 90 Consecutive Gynecomastia Surgeries with Tumescent Anesthesia. Journal of Basic Sciences and Applied Sciences, 5(2), 145-152. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jbsaps.2026.0152